Exploring the impact of broadband and technology on our lives, our businesses, and our communities.
It is spring, and around the country, many communities are starting water, sewer, and road projects of one kind or another. On the way back and forth to a project Design Nine is working on, I pass a water line project--a couple of miles of new water line along a major artery and business corridor, and the main route between two communities.
Any telecom duct going in the ditch? Nope. None. Zilch. For a very small incremental cost, duct could be put in alongside the water line that would provide an opportunity to create a major new fiber connection between those two towns, as well as hooking up businesses and homes along the way.
Another region is talking about the need for regional fiber connectivity, but a couple of years ago, they installed a major water line between two key towns and did not bother to put duct in the ditch. Now it is going to cost them a lot more to go back and install fiber.
Every community and planning region should have an open ditch policy that requires planners to evaluate water and sewer projects to see if fiber and duct should be installed, and to look at road repaving and sidewalk upgrades and improvements the same way.
The key to making this relatively simple is to spend a little money developing a community telecom infrastructure plan that outlines where fiber is needed. Once that is done, it is simple to determine if a duct or fiber should be installed alongside a water or sewer line.
An Apple blog reports on a Gartner Research study of computer sales. While growth of PC sales has been an anemic 2.6%, sales of Macs over the last six months have been increasing at a rate of 30%.
My guess is that uncertainty over Vista and the potentially high cost of upgrading existing PCs or having to buy new ones is depressing PC sales. Apple appears to be benefitting from the ability to run Windows natively right along side the Mac operating system, giving users an easy migration strategy.
The tragedy here in Blacksburg earlier this week highlights the dark side and the bright side of technology and the Internet, and is a useful reminder that technology is neither good nor bad--how people use it--for good or for evil--determines its value at any point in time.
Part of the dark side is the intense and almost suffocating media coverage, which began while events were still unfolding. Just a few years ago, this would have been a largely local event for at least a day or two, but with satellite and Internet technology, news organizations were covering this before it was even over. There is something surreal sitting in your office listening to the sirens wailing almost continuously as they carry the wounded to local hospitals--and watching live news reports via the computer and Internet. I could have walked over the scene, taken pictures, and uploaded them to this site or to others, and indeed, others did exactly that.
The phrase "too much information" comes to mind in this context. The NBC videos provided by the killer are more than we need to know, and may likely spawn copycats, just as the killer himself was obviously influenced by a dark Korean film of murder and mayhem. The constant repetition of the phrase "country's worst massacre" will likely encourage the next deranged individual to try even harder to surpass the Blacksburg death toll.
On the blogs, there are already countless thousands of articles, mostly playing Monday morning quarterback about what should or should not have happened. At some point, it all becomes noise.
The bright side is that this very same technology, used in precisely the same ways, has enabled an outpouring of kindness and compassion. Email, blogs, and Web sites are being used to help the families of the victims, to organize counseling and support, to reach out to those suffering from the effects, to encourage prayer, and to just send a few words of comfort.
We have a mighty tool in our hands, and how we use it is a measure of who we are and what we stand for.
Unfortunately, the horrific murders here in Blacksburg yesterday highlighted yet again the technical superiority of the Internet during emergencies. For most of the day, it was difficult to make a phone call on a landline or cellphone, with most calls being greeted with "All circuites are busy." But the local public and private Internet networks kept chugging away, providing students and parents a way to connect. Instant messaging also proved important, and the Internet is used as a gateway between different cellphone messaging services.
Rescue personnel, first responders, hospitals, and health officials were using a pre-planned emergency management Web site to help manage the heavy casualties. No one local hospital was able to handle all of the serious gun shot wounds, and four hospitals in the Blacksburg and Roanoke areas were providing assistance and coordinating activities via the Internet.
Public safety and disaster management is a key use of Internet technology for local government. A robust, high capacity, community-managed broadband network can be an engine for economic development and an important tool for public safety.
The blow up over Imus' idiotic remarks and a raging debate among bloggers about the need for civility online may just be the tipping point for a long overdue honest appraisal of the lack of civility in our social discourse. There is no question that over the past decade, the way we speak to each other and the language that we use has been coarsened to the point that sometimes I think we need to cover our ears. Shock jocks on the radio, the heavy use of profanity online, and a general lack of respect for viewpoints that differ from our own has made talking about issues difficult, if not painful.
The online debate focuses on the tendency of some bloggers and those that comment on blog articles to engage in what can only be described as childish diatribes, ad hominem attacks, and often just plain incoherent rants.
How did we get this way? It is not just the Internet--it is just as easy to be civil online as uncivil, so let's not shoot the messenger. But writing anonymously does seem to loosen our social inhibitions. Even if someone is posting a comment with their real name, in an online universe of a billion people, most of whom will never meet you, it is much the same as being anonymous. Somehow we have to pull ourselves back from the brink.
As always, it's not about the technology, it's about helping people learn to use it--respectfully and thoughtfully.
There are several stories about blogging making the rounds of the news sites, as well as an ongoing discussion in the business world about employee blogging.
Item One: Katie Couric is in the news because she tried to pass off a producer's made up story as her own thoughts. Couric is supposedly blogging, but as it turns out, other people write her blog. And those other people, as it turns out, did not have much to say either so they were cribbing from the Wall Street Journal.
Blogging Rule Number One: Don't bother to blog if you can't think of anything to write. Blogging, fundamentally, is writing and nothing else. Some people like to write, some people are actually good writers, and other people, like Couric, have some other talent they should be pursuing.
Item Two: An obscure blogger who had a comment posted by a reader has become the focus of a huge discussion on the Internet. The reader's comment made a disparaging remark about a firm called JL Kirk. The Kirk firm served an order on the blogger to take the comment down. But there is just a tiny problem; the Supreme Court has already decided that bloggers are not liable for the comments posted by readers. The bullying tactics by JL Kirk have guaranteed that the Kirk firm will be remembered for a long time as clueless bullies. A better tactic would have been to ignore the whole thing. By overreacting, they have probably caused irrepaparable damage to the firm.
Blogging Rule Number Two: Even if you don't read blogs, at least know what they are, how they work, and their immense power to focus both positive and negative publicity on an issue. I still meet many people who thinks blogs are insignificant because they personally don't bother with them. Big mistake, and from a community and economic development perspective, huge lost opportunities.
Item Three: Are your employees blogging about your company or organization? Do you even know how to check? If they are blogging, are they writing positive or negative things?
Blogging Rule Number Three: Have an employee or organizational policy about blogging about the company, have it in writing, and make sure it is enforced fairly and consistently. Employees and staff have every right to blog on their own time about non-work topics and interests, but you don't want a disgruntled employee slamming your firm online.
For communities, blog-type Web sites can be a critical marketing tool--done right. Few community leaders and economic developers understand the potential of blogs for economic development, and even fewer get good advice on how to design and manage a blog strategy.
Remember that most business relocation research is being done on the Web. If your community or region is not using modern tools to tell the right story in the right way, you are losing jobs and business opportunities to other areas.
The Wall Street Journal (page B5) reports today that the number of workers who have to commute 90 minutes or more each way to work has doubled since 1990. That adds up to three hours or more in the car every day. It takes a toll on job satisfaction, personal life, and family life.
Some of those commuters are looking for a place to work where commutes are not as long and not as stressful. When we lived in Craig County, I had a thirty minute "commute" back and forth to work, but the drive was so easy (no traffic) and so beautiful (down a highly rated Virginia Byway) that I looked forward to it at the end of the day as a way of unwinding on the way home.
For rural communities that have a plan, these millions of commuters are potential residents that can stop the flow of people moving away. What's in the plan?
How about your community? Do you have an economic development plan that is carefully targeted at attracting businesspeople tired of long commutes? Are you making the right investments to get them to take a close look at your region?
Hard on the heels of the release of the $300 Apple TV device, Apple has announced partnerships with Sony and Ikea today. Sometime in June, Sony will release an Apple/Sony flat screen television with the Apple TV completely integrated.
Apple TV is a small multimedia management device that allows users to send movies, TV shows, music, and pictures wirelessly from their computer to the Apple TV box, which is normally connected to a flat screen TV (it also works with tube-style televisions, but Apple is not promoting this feature).
Steve Jobs, in a press release, said, "Consumers are tired of the complex and confusing task of hooking up often dozens of cables just to be able to watch a video or play music through their entertainment system. The integration of Apple TV with Sony's best of class televisions eliminates ALL cables. Apple TV's wireless connection to media of all kinds from any computer with iTunes--Windows or Mac--brings Apple's ease of use to the living room."
Industry reaction to the announcement has been mixed. Some analysts expressed surprise, since Sony has tried numerous times to compete directly with Apple in markets like MP3 music players, home computers, and business laptops. The only market where Sony has had some success is in the small laptop niche, where Apple has never had a product similar to the popular Sony Viao notebooks. Other analysts indicated they thought that it showed Sony has decided to give up fighting Apple domination of the music and entertainment markets, and that the partnership made sense. One unnamed pundit said, "Sony TVs have always had a great reputation, but they are not dominating the market because of price. Integration with Apple TV will make the higher prices less of an issue because of the "no cables" feature. A lot of consumers will pay extra for that.
The real surprise was the Ikea link up. Jobs, standing alongside an array of Ikea entertainment centers, said Apple had been working with the Swedish firm for over a year to design an integrated entertainment cabling and cabinet design that will be used in six new Ikea entertainment centers. Each piece of furniture will be designed for a flat panel TV, a special shelf custom made for an Apple TV device, an iPod dock, and a concealed cable tray that hides the normally messy set of cables that normally dangle behind entertainment centers.
Each piece of furniture also comes with a set of cables that are exactly the right length to connect the TV, an Apple TV, the iPod dock, and a surround sound audio system.
In a classic "one more thing" Jobs moment, the CEO of Apple announced that the full line of Apple computers and entertainment devices would be on sale immediately at all Ikea stores, with a special Apple "store within a store" area in the popular furniture centers. Jobs remarked, "Who has not struggled with the dizzying array of cables needed to just play a song from an iPod or to watch a downloaded copy of "24?" Now you can go to Ikea and get everything you need to enjoy your music and entertainment, without the headeaches and frustration."
New Mexico's long term vision to dominate commercial space activities in the U.S. continues to mature. The New Mexico legislature has approved $30 million to fund further development of Spaceport America, and the venture already has a $27 million lease signed with Virgin Atlantic. Virgin plans to base its U.S. commercial space operations there, with tourist flights starting before the end of this decade.
It is an instructive lesson for other communities with tough economic challenges. By almost every measure, New Mexico has had a tough time. But the state worked with what it has in abundance--empty land--and turned it into an asset. It was not money or Federal grants that got this done. It was a clearly articulated vision and the determination and grit to stick with it.
Want to be part of the Space Economy? Move to New Mexico. Some of the best high tech jobs in the country are already beginning to move there: composite materials manufacturing for space craft, space avionics, space and air traffic control, advanced air and spacecraft manufacturing, flight testing, and ground support operations and maintenance, to name a few.
Slashdot reports that the FCC is still studying net neutrality. The problem is, there really is not anything to study. Big carriers are playing all sorts of games with traffic to favor their own services (e.g. VoIP) over the services of competitors (e.g. Vonage, Skype). Google is buying fiber because it knows it cannot rely on others to carry bandwidth-intensive video traffic. YouTube is valuable only if people can actually play the videos, and that means being able to deliver the video across the network end to end.
Unless we want the economic future of our communities controlled by broadband providers, things have to change. The FCC's "yet another study" approach is consistent with their general favoritism towards big providers and an utter lack of interest in developing new models for telecommunications service delivery.
Communities like Palo Alto, California have decided that local control, using a community-managed form of net neutrality, is the right way to go, and I agree. Local net neutrality can be easily accomplished with an open services architecture that provides a fair and level playing field for all qualified service providers.