Exploring the impact of broadband and technology on our lives, our businesses, and our communities.
Down near the bottom of this interview with NBC Television Group president Jeff Zucker, he states that there are a half million downloads per week of just one NBC television show--Battlestar Galactica.
Let's do the math. You can buy that show from the iTunes video store for a penny less than $2, so with just a relatively small portion of the population with both a broadband connection and the interest/know-how to watch video on their computer, NBC could be making as much a million dollars per episode, or not far from what they take in advertising (an average one hour show might cost about $1.5 million to produce).
Imagine what will happen when most of the population has a broadband connection and a small computer hooked directly to their television. Among other changes, we are likely to see more variety, less "formula" shows, and higher quality shows. Producers and studios will be able to design and write shows directly for fans, rather than for advertisers. And the pay to view system will provide immediate, high quality data about what people want to watch.
It's going to get very interesting.
The last time I checked, there were four or five states (including my home state of Virginia) that were toying with the idea of a spaceport. But New Mexico may have won the first race (there will be more than one spaceport in the country).
Virgin Atlantic has signed a $225 million dollar deal with New Mexico to build a spaceport in southern New Mexico. The spaceport is expected to attract hundreds of millions of dollars of additional private investment and to bring thousands of jobs to what may be the poorest part of one of the poorest states in the U.S.
New Mexico drove a stake in the ground several years ago in this area. Instead of wringing its hands and complaining about how bad things were, the state looked around, identified its assets (in this case, a government research facility and a lot of flat, sandy land), and said, in effect, "We've got lemons. Let's make some lemonade."
I will venture to say few took the effort seriously, but New Mexico stuck to its plan, worked hard to attract aerospace companies, and kept its eye on the ball. This is probably the biggest thing to happen to the state since it became a state. And it will transform the economy of the entire state.
Boldness and vision, managed correctly, can have a big payoff. How about economic developers in your region? Is there boldness and vision in your region's economic development strategy?
There is speculation that a well-organized series of cyberattacks on sensitive U.S. government and government contractor sites may be organized by the Chinese army.
This article talks about the growing security problem but offers little firm evidence that the Chinese military is behind it. But given that China is a military dictatorship with rigid control over the country's Internet, it could be plausible.
Regardless of who is behind the attacks, it is a reminder that network security is just part of the job of managing company and community networks.
BellSouth has somewhat humorously agreed that network neutrality is important in principle but the company then went on to say that no legislation is needed to ensure that because, "We're a big telecom company and would never do anything bad."
Okay, I made that last quote up--BellSouth did not actually say that in exactly that way, but read the article [link no longer available] and see what you think.
Network neutrality is the concept that your Internet access provider (i.e. your DSL or cable modem provider) cannot block services coming from other vendors. This issue is rapidly coming to a boil because the telephone and cable companies want to block third party VoIP providers. The telephone and cable companies want to sell that service to you themselves.
But there is something bigger at work in all this than clumsy efforts to preserve old-style monopolies. Our current system of charging for a broadband connection is badly broken. There is very little relationship between the fees we pay for broadband and the amount of bandwidth we actually use. And new services like VoIP and IP TV have turned the heat up. The current system is unsustainable.
Network neutrality is important, but it's awfully hard to make it work when some service providers get a free ride on part of the Internet, which is what happens now.
The solution is to make broadband connections free, but to charge for services, and to split those fees among the several entities that are involved in both providing the service and providing the infrastructure that the service uses. By doing so, the market forces prices to rise or fall based on demand for the service, rather than the made up cost of an empty or partially full "pipe."
Researchers at Clarkson University have found it is trivially easy to spoof some of the current biometric security systems that use a finger or thumb print as an identification mechanism. They found that making a mold of a fingerprint using modeling clay (e.g. Play Doh) was effective 90% of the time in fooling the hardware.
However, they are developing new systems that measure perspiration found on the fingers as an additional parameter. This would stop someone from using a finger from a cadaver or from a mold as a way of gaining access.
Good news, sort of. But you have to wonder why the vendors that make these systems did not bother to test them with this kind of spoofing. My guess--in some cases, much of the design and engineering work was outsourced, meaning there was less "big picture" thinking about the problem and possible security attacks. For IT companies, outsourcing the design and engineering of the core product line may save money up front, but it carries big risks down the line when goofs like this come to light.
SBC's Midwest Networking President, Kirk Brannock (currently serving on the Illinois Governor's Broadband Deployment Council) is getting his fifteen minutes of fame. He was captured on video at a public hearing stating that "fiber is an unproven technology."
It is an interesting assertion since SBC's networks would collapse without the tens of thousands of miles of fiber the company uses to run their entire phone and data system.
In the same video, Brannock arrogantly states that, "...what are you going to do with 20 megabits?" Um, the same things the Japanese, the Australians, the Chinese, the Candadians, and the Irish are doing with 100 megabit connections--just five times more slowly.
He keeps going though, and says that of their trial of 3 meg fiber in Milwaukee, "...most users won't use that."
The condescension of this guy is almost beyond belief. At one point, he talks about the "Dr. Suess" answer to upload/download speeds. So SBC believes their customers are small children that need simplistic answers to the economic future of their communities, and that SBC customers deserve nothing more than a pat on the head and a "We know better than you what your needs are" as a reply to legitimate questions about the company's service offerings.
The video clip (it's very short) is here, thanks to the Tri-City Broadband Citizens Group.
A wave of new search engines are coming. The business theory behind them is that peeling off just a small piece of Google's massive market domination is good money. Also driving things is the growing realization that Google has not done a darn thing to improve their search engine since they rolled it out (not as far as I can tell, anyway), making the company vulnerable to anyone who can provide a better mousetrap.
Jookster seems to do a much better job of weeding out irrelevant and spam-style sites from results, based on a very unscientific test of a few queries. On Google, I would get hundreds or thousands of results. Jookster was returned (typically) fifty or less results that were highly relevant.
The logo explains the name--the company is using a variant of the native American jokester Kokopelli, and part of the joke may be adding the extra 'o' like Google. So if nothing else, these folks have a sense of humor.
Jookster adds an interesting but unproven twist on searching by allowing you to have a network of friends/associates that share a set of keywords and searches. By letting the company share your searches with your "network," the quality of the results goes up.
So Jookster is combining search with social networks. It's an interesting idea, but entirely unproven. As always, I'm very leery of giving away too much personal information to these companies, but we have a whole generation of younger people who think nothing of putting everything about themselves on the network, with Facebook an example of the trend. According to TechCrunch, an astounding 85% of college students use the service.
We may be entering an age when there is no privacy, and where most people think that is fine.
Apple has added more video content to the iTunes Music Store, which probably needs to be renamed as the video becomes a bigger piece of what is sold. Current shows added include The Office and Battlestar Galatica, as well as a bunch of older shows, ranging from Knight Rider to Alfred Hitchcock Presents. The deal is with NBC Studios.
In the few months that video has been available for sale from Apple, the company has sold more than 3 million episodes at about $2/piece.
Here is a report from Denmark about how one group is trying to nurture and promote the growth of microbusinesses. Stick with the article to the end, and you will find a useful list of activities and projects that would apply in any community or region. Does your economic development game plan include these kinds of activities?
This very short article discusses a new use for the video iPod. Real estate agents are making short video clips of homes for sale and making them available for download into a video iPod. Other agents can download the videos and to learn more about a property and/or show the videos to prospective home buyers.
I've been writing a lot about the iPod recently. I don't own any stock in Apple, and have no financial interest in the iPod. But I see the iPod as the first of a whole series of transformative devices that are going to emerge over the next five to ten years that will, like the iPod, transform the way we do things.
Bottom line: If you don't understand the iPod phenomenon, you will have a very difficult time correctly assessing economic development activities and what direction to take your community or region. My articles are not really about the iPod itself, they are about what the iPod represents--entirely new ways of doing business, new kinds of businesses, and new kinds of jobs. Ignore the iPod at your peril.