Exploring the impact of broadband and technology on our lives, our businesses, and our communities.

BPL: Electric company says no to being ISP

Here is an interesting article in the New York Times (registration required) about an experiment by Con Ed, the big New York City area electric provider, with Broadband Over Powerlines (BPL).

The BPL trial is not particularly noteworthy. I'll bet most of the electric utilities in the country have bought some equipment and are playing around with it. No, what's worth mentioning is that Con Ed has said, "Our aim is definitely not to become an Internet service provider."

Yes! That's exactly right. Con Ed has partnered with EarthLink, which will be the ISP. Con Ed is simply going to provide the transport layer, and the electric company is going to do what it does best, which is to go around and bury cable. They are doing what they know how to do, and will make a buck leasing their transport system (the electric lines) to someone else, who knows the Internet access business. Even better, Earthlink has not been trying to capture the content side of the broadband business, which the cable and telephone companies would like to do. Aside from a modest portal site, EarthLink is also sticking to the knitting.

If BPL becomes a force in the marketplace (and the jury is still out on the economics of that because of the amount of equipment needed to retrofit an electric service area), it will most likely succeed if the electric utilities do what Con Ed is doing--provide the transport layer and partner with others on access and service.

And thre is a lesson there for communities that want to jumpstart broadband--provide the transport layer and let the private sector deliver the access and services. Pay for the community investment by being the "carrier's carrier" and have just a few bulk customers (the access and service providers). It's a nice, clean business model that does not compete with the private sector and does not re-monopolize the marketplace (by creating a new public monopoly for broadband).

Technology News:

The Smart-Aleck House, Version 3.0

It got chilly all of a sudden; someone was pulling the covers off the bed. I sat up groggily and looked around. My wife was still sound asleep on the other side of the bed; it was not likely that she would notice anyway, since she tends to sleep with the covers half off in the first place. It was the whirring noise that finally caught my attention; Marvin, the robo-butler, was down at the bottom of the bed, slowly and methodically dragging the comforter off. He seemed to be getting a bit confused, because the covers had flopped over top of him, covering his optical sensors.

I yanked them away from him and tried to go back to sleep, but even more commotion started up downstairs. It sounded like every appliance in the house had come on, all at once. Imagine, if you will, the coffee grinder, the disposal, the dishwasher, the vacuum cleaner, the dryer, and the washing machine, all going at once. I was waking up now, and threw my legs over the side of the bed, stepped into my slippers and housecoat, and headed downstairs. Marvin trailed behind me, muttering under his breath, his little wheel motors whining. I looked longingly at my wife, who was still sound asleep.

After I shut everything off, and got the baby out of her crib (she thought it was hilarious to have the vacuum cleaner driving in circles on her rug at 6:30 in the morning), I poured a cup of java from the Coff-o-Mat and sat down for a little chat with Harry, the house computer.

"Harry, what the heck is going on?"

"Well, Dave, you wouldn't get up this morning when I tried to wake you."

"Harry, it's Saturday morning and we were out late last night. You knew that, because you made me review the chore list at half past twelve."

"I guess I just forgot, Dave. It won't happen again."

"Alright, I'll forget about it. Now what's for breakfast?"

"Well, Dave, how about two scrambled eggs and a piece of whole wheat toast?"

"Sounds good."

"Coming right up, Dave."

I harrumphed, then started to get up to go look for the paper.

"Dave?"

"Yea, Harry, what do you want?"

"Dave, I'm very sorry about the incident this morning. I want you to know that Marvin had nothing to do with it; I made him pull the covers off you."

I knew Marvin had nothing to do with it; Marvin was a motorized idiot that worked off a radio link with Harry, and really was not capable of much without direction from the house computer. If the house computer went down for any length of time, all Marvin could do was find his way back to his power dock so his batteries would not run down in the middle of the yard, or somewhere equally inconvenient. Marvin, despite his diminutive four foot stature, weighed a hefty two hundred and fifty pounds. A bad circuit board had left him stranded in the back yard once, and it had taken me and three neighbors to heave him up the back steps into the house so we could re-charge him.

"Harry, I said forget about it. I have."

"Okay, Dave."

I stopped and wondered for a second if Harry would or could forget it. Harry was the latest thing in automated house control, and there were still a few things the manufacturers did not seem to have a handle on. One of them was exactly how his neural network main control program worked. It was self-modifying, so Harry tended to be slightly unpredictable at times.

I stepped outside and wandered up the driveway to get the newspaper. When I got back to the house I nearly broke my nose on the front door; it was locked.

"Open the door." Nothing. I cleared my throat and tried again; maybe there were cobwebs in the microphone/speaker grill.

"Open the door." Nothing. I rattled the handle; the door was definitely locked. Jeez, it was cold out. I was standing outside in thirty-seven degree weather in my PJs, freezing my patooties off.

"Harry, open the door, please." Harry finally responded to my plea.

"Whom may I ask is calling?" Whom may I ask is calling? I started to wonder about Harry's circuits, and I was losing my patience to boot.

"Harry, this is Dave. Open the darn door--I'm freezing out here."

"I'm very sorry, sir, but Dave is not here. He has stepped out momentarily." I was really getting confused now. Not only had Harry started talking like a bad movie's idea of an English butler, he did not seem to know who I was. I lost it at this point.

"I'm Dave, you stupid excuse for silicon. Let me in."

"I'm very sorry, but Dave's not here. Please leave a name and number, and I will have him call you when he returns.

At this point I took a swipe at the door with my foot, but missed and bashed my big toe on the door frame. I screamed in pain, hopped around for a bit, then started to hobble across the lawn to the neighbor's house to call my wife to let me in. For all I knew, she was still asleep. I got about half way across the lawn when the in-ground sprinkler system started up; I was caught in the cross-fire of four high-pressure impulse sprinkler heads, and quicker than you can say gallium arsenide, I was soaked to the skin. Just as suddenly, the water turned off.

I did manage to get the rest of the way over the neighbor's house without incident, and thankfully, Mike and Mary Grace were already up and eating breakfast. I recounted my tale to them while I dried off. Mike lent me an old shirt and a pair of sweat pants, and after I had a cup of coffee, I dialed up our number. I should have guessed, but Harry answered, not my wife. Among other things, when I purchased Harry, I had bought the answering machine interface, which enabled Harry to take messages when we were out of the house or away from the phone.

"Hello, this is the Matthews residence. The Matthews are not home right now, but I would be most pleased to take your message for them." Harry was still impersonating the English butler.

"Harry, this is Dave. Let me talk to Terrie."

"I'm sorry, sir. Dave and Terrie are not home right now. Could I take a message?"

"Harry, this is Dave, you stupid machine. Wake up Terrie and tell her I'm on the phone."

"I'm very sorry. If you continue be abusive, sir, I will have to disconnect you and alert the phone police." The phone police? What the hell was he talking about? I began to wonder if he had suffered a power surge that had burnt out his circuits. I hung up. I borrowed a screw driver, a hammer, and an umbrella from Mike, and went back to the house. The sprinklers came on, but I was ready this time; I had already extended the umbrella. My shoes got a little wet, but that's all.

I went around to the back of the house, and began to jimmy the lock on the back door. It was a wooden frame, so I figured I could just chisel out part of the jamb and pop the latch. There was no deadbolt on this door, and I was glad now I had never gotten around to putting one on. Harry was close by, though. He had a speaker and optical sensor on the porch.

"What are you doing, Dave." Aha. Progress at last; Harry had dropped the phony butler stuff, and he did know who I was after all.

"Harry, I'm coming in, and when I do, I'm turning you off, permanently. Your guarantee hasn't expired yet, and I'm getting my money back."

"Dave, I don't think that's such a good idea. Why don't you sit down and talk about it for a while? I'll have Marvin bring you a cup of nice hot coffee and a cinnamon bun."

"Harry, it's cold out here, you squirted water all over me, you pretended not to know who I am, and wouldn't let me talk to my wife. Go to hell."

"Dave, you really sound upset about this. I'm very sorry it happened, and I can assure you that it won't happen again. I've just been a little under the weather, but I'm diagnosing my circuits right now." I was still working on the lock; it was harder to jimmy than I thought.

"Hold it right there, buster. Drop the tools and raise your arms slowly above your head, then turn around where we can see you." Sheesh. Harry had apparently called the cops, and here I was, in old burglar clothes, my hands full of burglar tools, trying to break the latch off the door. I turned around slowly.

"Officer, I can explain everything....."

Well, I did, actually. I convinced the two officers to walk over to Mike and Mary Grace's to confirm my story, and they did, but Harry turned the sprinklers on on the way over, so they were mad as all heck about the whole thing, and went back to their car and got a big crowbar they use in emergencies to get people out of cars in a hurry if there was an accident or something.

We used the crowbar on the back door and got in real fast then, and proceeded directly to the basement, where Harry "resided", and I said, gee isn't that a rabid skunk in the corner there, next to the computer, and both officers said yes I believe it is and don't you know they fired at the poor sick animal several times and missed every time, accidentally hitting Harry in several vital spots, though. We all looked vigorously for the rabid skunk, but he must of got away, and we all said, gee, too bad about the computer, and we all nodded our heads, yea, too bad.

Terrie never even heard the gunshots. She had slept through the whole thing. The baby was fine; Harry, while I was outside, put the Food-o-matic on auto-dispense, and the kitchen floor was filled with cookies, on which the baby was happily nibbling.

The Happy Home Robot people came a week later and took everything away without too many questions, although I got some funny looks when I told about the rabid skunk. They sent my money back, though, so I think they must of known about the problems with that particular model. I'm not much inclined towards smart houses anymore. I even got rid of the VCR after that; the little blinking "12:00" really started to get on my nerves.

Technology News:

Will smart homes really be smart?

Here's an interesting note about an industry drive to make our homes "smart."

I wrote an article fifteen years ago about this, which I've posted in a separate item. The IT industry is drving the smart home phenomenon in part because it's "cool," and in part because it will increase profits. A very small part of smart home stuff will actually make things more convenient, but I remain skeptical.

If you buy into the smart home concept, it means replacing virtually every powered device in your home--coffe makers, washers, driers, refrigerators, stereos, and so on. A lot of money. And for what? So you can turn on your coffee maker by sending a Bluetooth signal from your Palm Pilot while you are still in bed? And then worry constantly you are going to turn the coffeemaker on by accident and burn the house down. No thanks.

I've had some ABus equipment for several years, but have never quite gotten around to installing it, because of the complexity of designing and installing the wiring and room controls. ABus is an industry standard for being able to distribute music from a single source to a bunch of different rooms in the house. You can control the volume in each room separately, and can even use your remote controls to change radio channels or switch to a different CD if you have a multi-CD player.

But it always seems like an enormous effort to get it all working, compared to just sticking one of the now very small stereos on a shelf in the room and forgetting about it.

Technology News:

FCC may regulate VoIP

This story says the FCC is interested in regulating VoIP [link no longer available].

FCC Chairman Powell has a point--if the Feds do nothing, some states will certainly step in and try to control the new service and/or try to tax it, leading to only one possible outcome--a mess. The states can't possibly regulate VoIP, because it's not a place-based service. Companies like Vonage and AT&T don't have to any equipment located anywhere in a state to sell VoIP service to residents, and so the notion that a state should be trying to control an out of state company is silly. Nonetheless, some states will try.

According the article, Powell is a big fan of VoIP, and wants to see it succeed. Good. If the FCC uses a light hand here and keeps the states out of it, that's entirely appropriate.

Broadband Over Powerlines (BPL) gets the green light

BPL has the green light from the FCC. The NewsFactor has an article that goes into more detail. I have to agree with the conclusions the author makes--BPL is not likely to be a major factor for rural communities. Like DSL and cable modems, you have to have a critical mass of customers to justify the expense of the equipment. And it is not significantly less expensive to install than DSL or cable, so it won't have a big price advantage.

It may make a difference in some communities, but communities will have to continue to do the hard work of market creation through content and service offerings via a community network project, and ongoing training and education programs.

Like DSL and cable, BPL is another technology that potentially lets a single public or private company capture the entire broadband marketplace (unless the community makes some transport layer infrastructure investments to level the playing field). Once a single company has captured the marketplace, the community's economic future is now at the mercy of that company. Is that what you want?

Voting machines problems--already

As many had predicted (including me), the electronic voting systems are likely to be troublesome, if not downright threats to our country itself.

It is almost unbelievable, but some electronic voting systems in Florida failed within the first hours of use. So much for vendor claims of reliability.

Even more alarming, some of the systems apparently require telecom links back to another system in another location. The article referenced above describes how poll workers had to call on the telephone to verify voter registration, because the data link went down.

How on earth could elected officials agree to buy voting systems that rely on remote systems and datalinks? Anyone that has ever suffered at the hands of dropped modem connections knows these things don't always work. And any network technician can tell you that temporary hookups, like those that would be required for one day (or in Florida's case, two weeks) of voting, would be even more likely to fail.

I've got my fingers crossed that we get through this election without the contentious vote-counting issues of four years ago, but I don't have a good feeling about this. This time, I hope I'm wrong.

Technology News:

New hydrogen storage system

British researchers report that they have developed a new nanomaterial that stores hydrogen at low pressure. Hydrogen storage has been a primary obstacle to the development of a practical hydrogen-powered vehicle. To get enough fuel in a tank that will take a car a reasonable distance, until now, very high pressures were required.

The new nanomaterial absorbs hydrogen at high pressure but then stores the same amount of fuel at a lower pressure.

Technology News:

RTC Conference wrap up

I'm back from the Rural Telecommunications Congress Annual Conference in Spokane. It's the oldest and one of the only conferences focused on rural issues related to telecommunications and broadband.

There was a definite shift in energy, conversations, and presentations at the meeting. In past years, much of the discussions have focused on the "why" and the "if" of rural community investments in technology. This year, the conversation has shifted to "how." And it was not just me. Everyone I talked to agreed that the time of talking about doing something "in the future" is past. It's clear that limited funds are going to be available from state and Federal sources, so communities have to dig in, roll up their sleeves, and get going.

Vendor booths were crowded, and the vendors I talked to were pleased with the response they were getting to their products. One of the most exciting product lines I've seen in years is from PacketFront, a network equipment vendor that is designing their equipment specifically for use in open access networks. Network leader Cisco, by comparison, does not have an equivalent set of products.

Presentations were information-rich, with communities coming online and now being able to report their experiences in detail, rather than having to talk about future plans. All in all, it was a terrific meeting, and I can't wait for next year. As it has been for the past several years, this is my number one, must attend conference.

Technology News:

iPod still very popular

Despite the availability of several "iPod killer" products from companies like Dell and Sony, the latest marketing data shows the Apple iPod has captured 92% of the portable MP3 music players with hard drives, and 65% of the overall portable player market.

What the iPod has that the other products don't is superb cross-platform music management/player software (iTunes is available for Windows and the Mac) and superb integration with the iTunes Music Store.

What is encouraging about the popularity of the iPod is that we sem to be moving beyond buying technology purely on price. The success of the iPod shows that consumers are very discriminating, and are want products that are designed well and are easy to use. The iPod delivers both.

Technology News:

RTC Conference: What states can do about broadband deployment

Bob Rowe, from the Montana Public Service Commission, is the first speaker in this session.

Rowe says that states have a role in assisting regional deployment of infrastructure and to coordinate facilities permitting.

Local governments have much potential, and can do training, form buying pools, encourage local government investments in infrastructure, and promote egovernment.

The FCC Section 706 Report from September, 2004 notes that the FCC defines broadband as 200 kilobits/second or faster, that the US still lags the rest of the world in broadband deployment, and that the FCC has a mission to encourage "reasonable and timely deployment."

Bill Gillis, from the Center to Bridge the Digital Divide, is the next speaker. Gillis says that we can learn from "innovation businesses."

He says that an innovation business is knowledge intensive, makes extensive use of technology, is creative and flexible with respect o workforce functions, has a global business perspective, and has entrepreneurial management.

Gillis says that states can facilitate exchange of ideas, help the last 30% of residents that do not have broadband service, can help prepare the workforce for the innovation economy, and provide flexible gap capital. Innovation businesses are driving demand for broadband in rural areas.

The final speaker is Al Hammond, from the Santa Clara School of Law and the Alliance for Public Technology.

Hammond says that large parts of rural America lack adequate broadband services, with smaller towns at a real disavantage--only 5% of towns of 10,000 population or less have broadband.

BPL (Broadband over Power Lines) is getting a lot of interest. There are more electric lines to homes and businesses than phone lines, so BPL potentially can be widely deployed. At least 5 companies are manufacturing BPL equipment.

25 million homes have no cable modem or DSL service, and satellite broadband is becoming more affordable, with Wild Blue, a new statellite company, will be offering Internet access for about $50/month. TV programming will also be available, unlike some other satellite broadband systems.

BPL issues include whether or not public utilities are cross-subsidizing BPL (and/or should be allowed to), universal service, open access issues (open vs. closed network), right of way issues, and whether a BPL provider is a utility, a telecomm provider, or a broadband provider.

Pages

Subscribe to Front page feed