Exploring the impact of broadband and technology on our lives, our businesses, and our communities.
The FBI continues to lobby to try to force ISPs to snoop for the government. This is something the federal agency has been asking for for years, and has tried to get Congress and the FCC to go along with the plan.
What the FBI wants is for every ISP to provide private access to an ISPs entire network so that the FBI can just log in and snoop at its convenience. In theory, court orders would be required, just like wiretaps, but to have private backdoors is to invite abuse.
And if the FBI really believes they need access to the network of an ISP, they can get a court order today and go to the ISP and get whatever records they need. So it is not like they need the new regulations to get something they don't have. Even in a time of war, the FBI is asking for too much power.
Prepare to be depressed. French Telecom has just announced that it is rolling out fiber service in major cities with download speeds of 2.5 Gigabits/second and upload speeds of 1.2 Gigabits/second. The cost? Seventy Euros, or about $85 US.
Meanwhile, in the U.S., the heads of the major telecoms are patting us on the head and telling us we don't need superhighways to our homes, that DSL sidwalks are just fine. A typical DSL connection in the U.S. is about two thousand times slower than the Gigabit service being rolled out in France.
This article is in French, but you can see the speeds discussed in the second paragraph.
Many a science fiction novel has included a device that can spit out any kind of product automagically simply by feeding in design specs for it. Neal Stephenson's Diamond Age is just one example with that kind of technology. But in this case, gee whiz scifi ideas are fast becoming ho-hum reality. Lockheed's Skunkworks airplane design facility has printed out an entire four ton airplane using 3D printing technology, which until recently has been used largely for models and short run fabrication of small parts. Most of the parts in the plane were fabricated using the 3D printing system and then assembled.
Economic developers: When was the last time you held a seminar for local businesses on this technology and its uses? What local businesses could benefit from this technology to improve its products or lower costs?
We know exactly what will happen if the big telecom companies succeed in convincing Congress to let them partition the Internet. We have a perfectly good example of the mess we will be in, and it is called the cellphone industry. Read this article [link no longer available] to see how innovation is choked off, small businesses are forced out of the market place, and how consumers end up paying more, much more, for mediocre services.
Right now, anyone with a good idea can start an Internet-based business and know that the service will be available to anyone with an Internet connection. What the telecom companies want is a "two tier" system, but in reality there will be many tiers, and companies that want to sell a service over a Verizon network, as an example, will likely have to pay high up front fees and high monthly fees, before any revenue comes back to the new enterprise. This means most new business ideas will never launch, because the start up costs will be too high, and the next Google or eBay will never have a chance. Let's hope Congress comes to its senses before it is too late.
A three year old Philadelphia project to turn waste into gas, oil, and minerals has been so successful that the EPA and private investors are putting money behind expansion of the effort. One of the new sites will be in Missouri, near a turkey processing plant. The energy recycling plant will turn 200 tons of turkey guts into 10 tons of gas and 600 barrels of oil. The gas is used to power the plant, which is 85% efficient.
This looks like a free lunch because you get three for one; you reduce the amount of waste going into landfills, you get local production of energy products, and you reduce reliance on foreign oil.
The system uses exactly the same processes the earth uses to turn organic matter into oil, but while that takes millions of years for the earth to do it, using heat and pressure in the right amounts lets the energy plant accomplish the same thing in a few hours. The system is owned by Changing World Technologies, and while this has been tried before, the company developed a new approach that makes it much more efficient in terms of the amount of energy required for the conversion process.
This is just one more examply why the notion of running out oil--as a crisis--is looking at things from the wrong end of the telescope--it is an opportunity. How about your region? Do you have companies with significant waste streams of organic matter? Why not compete directly with the Middle East and become an oil and gas producer? It will reduce the strain on your landfill, create jobs, generate taxes, and diversify your local economy.
If you want a perfect example of what is driving the likes of Verizon and Comcast crazy, take a look at CNet TV, which is currently in beta. CNet has a huge collection of video material that has been available on some cable systems for a long time, and they are now putting all this on the Web.
Whoever designed the CNet TV site has done a pretty nice job, stealing liberally from both iTunes and iPod software design. Overall, the effort is nicely done, and provides a good glimpse of the future of television. These sorts of Web-based TV efforts must leave broadcast and cable operators bawling in a corner for Mommy. CNet TV makes 20th century cable and TV technology look, well, so 20th century.
Video quality is adequate, which means you can watch it comfortably in a medium-sized window, but there is noticeable pixellation, like virtually all similar Web TV systems. Quality is better than most You Tube videos.
As I watched the introduction, I had to chuckle when the CNet spokeswoman encouraged me to "enjoy hours of video." Uh huh. This is the weak point in all these schemes. Hardly any of us has "hours" to sit around watching fuzzy video on fairly arcane and/or obscure topics. The fact that college kids (who do have hours to sit around watching, um, "hours of video") drives up the traffic at these sites does not mean the general population does.
If had two free hours, I'd much rather download Pirates of the Caribbean and watch it than two hours of geeks talking about the differences between the Red Hat and Ubuntu versions of Linux. I have said it before, and I'll say it again: both podcasts and videocasts take time, and that is what we have the least of these days. I can scan a Web page of text and images quickly and determine its value, but I can't scan a thirty minute video on a tech topic of interest and figure out if I should watch it or not.
Make no mistake: video and audio content is driving the whole Internet, and the telecom and cable companies are terrified of losing control over content; hence, we have their feeble argument that tollgates are the only way to go. They are the only way to go if all we want is to cement their current duopoly in perpetuity. CNet TV is a great example of the kind of rich, and yes, often useful, content that will be commonplace.
This article is a great summary of some of the new "Search 2.0" search engines that represent third generation technologies. The first generation of search engines were those that simply indexed the content of Web pages, with the venerable Alta Vista as the best example. Google defined second generation search technology, which looked at links to and from a Web page as a way of determining relevance.
Third generation search engines go well beyond the aging Google model, using intelligent clustering of results, natural language processing, and more human input to improve search results. Clusty is one of my favorites, which tries to cluster results into categories. This is especially helpful when a search query tends to include results from more than one topic area, which happens a lot. When you get search results back, you can quickly pick the appropriate cluster and whack out a lot of dreck. For example, if you put in the word 'record,' which can have different meanings in different contexts, Clusty returns 199 clusters, with the top ten results sets on the first page. It is pretty likely one of those sets is the correct one.
Another interesting one is Lexxe, which says it uses natural language processing to improve query results. It seems to work. The same two word query that Google coughed up 68,000 results for returned just 100 results in Lexxe.
One might reasonably ask why Google has not bothered to improve its search engine. Currently, the company probably thinks it does not have to--its quarterly earnings shot up again. But the Internet can turn on a dime, and I continue to believe that Google could fall, and fall quickly. In the meantime, try some of these new search engines; they save time and produce better results.
The Mainstream Media (MSM) have consistently turned their backs on bloggers with portrayals as amateurs in "pajamas," among other characterizations. A lot of data on blogging has been self-serving, in one way or another. Sites like Technorati consistently overstate the importance of blog sites, and bloggers themselves often take themselves too seriously. On the other side, the MSM has usually tried to understate the impact of bloggers on the news and on the craft of journalism itself.
A new study from the Pew Foundation suggests, however, that blogging itself and the audience of blog readers has been growing steadily. Mystery Pollster reports on this, with a link to the full study. Among the interesting tidbits is the fact that nearly 40% of Internet users read blogs regularly. That number suggests that blogs are well on their way to becoming a permanent news and information channel, and not just a fad.
While it is true there are a lot of dull and/or low traffic blogs that don't deserve much attention, many blogs have become a routine source of news. The steady increase in readers mirrors the traffic on this site, which has increased steadily year to year since I started in 2002, and Technology Futures has typically seen year to year increases of 300 to 400 percent.
Rumors are flying that Apple will announce that the iTunes store will start carrying movies. Apple will hold its annual developers conference in a couple of weeks, and lots of people expect that Steve Jobs will show off the ability to download a movie and watch it at home. Supposedly Apple has struck deals with many of the major movie studios. What is likely is that the movies will have a time stamp that will allow you to watch them all you want for a limited amount of time (like a week or two). This would mirror going down to Blockbuster and renting a movie.
Of course, you will have to have a good broadband connection to do this, and services like this will begin to separate the men (cable modem broadband) from the boys (DSL). It is going to take a LOT longer to download these movies via most residential DSL connections (perhaps 2-3 times longer). But some may not notice too much, as you will have to plan the downloads in advance. Even with a cable modem, we are talking about hours, not minutes, and most people will probably order movies the night before they actually want to watch them.
Movie rental stores like Blockbuster are going to feel the squeeze unless they can develop their own download systems, which has been the Netflix plan all along (note that they did not call the company "Mailflix").
As Design Nine works with more and more communities on broadband development, I have become convinced that the only financial model that is going to work over the long term is the Open Service Provider Network (OSPN). What this means is that the network is designed, constructed, and managed specifically to allow and support a marketplace of service providers that compete for subscribers.
It does not really matter if your broadband system is part of a privately owned duopoly (i.e. the cable or telephone companies), or if your system is municipally owned. If you don't have choice for services, you are going to pay more for those services and get less for your money.
The longer term issue is financial viability. With a private company or government officials choosing which of a handful of services they think you should have, there just is not enough money flowing through the system to support and maintain a broadband network over decades. It is not enough to get the system built; you have to have a business model that will produce enough income to pay for maintenance and system upgrades over the long term. Many of the public systems that seem to be doing well right now are likely, in my opinion, to run into capacity and maintenance problems five to seven years out, as equipment wears out and/or requires upgrades.
The beauty of an OSPN system is that you don't put limits on either services or revenue. As new services become available, new income streams to help pay for maintenance and upgrades also becomes available. This is completely different from the current model of simply selling chunks of bandwidth, which immediately puts a cap on how much revenue is returned to the network operator (i.e. the community).
The good news is that there is off the shelf OSPN systems available. I was in Houston, Texas this week to see a cable TV operator preparing to roll out an OSPN, all fiber network, and the versatility of the system was simply amazing. If you would like to know more about OSPN designs and how to finance a community broadband network, give Design Nine a call. We'll be glad to help.